ResilienceScore gives leadership a defensible AAA-to-D recovery rating built from evidence quality, recovery testing discipline, dependency exposure, and decision readiness.
Built by CRSE and Singularity Research for organisations that need one decision-grade answer before ransomware, regulator pressure, buyer due diligence, or insurance renewal forces the conversation.
Defensible, but constrained.
ResilienceScore is designed for the point where leadership needs a recovery position that can be challenged, defended, and prioritised.
Documented intent and green dashboards can create comfort, but they do not prove recoverability under real disruption pressure.
Leadership needs one decision-grade view of recovery readiness, not a collection of partial dashboards that disagree with each other.
Most teams know there are gaps. Few can show which exposures are score-breaking, which are tolerable, and what should happen next.
Assertions without tested evidence leave boards, insurers, and buyers guessing whether the recovery position would survive scrutiny.
The framework is meant to give leadership a usable output: a scored position, visible constraints, and a practical conversation about what deserves action next.
Use structured questions across technical, governance, delivery, and leadership pillars to convert scattered inputs into one rated position.
Hard caps and drag factors reveal where weak evidence, poor testing discipline, or critical dependency gaps should stop the score from drifting upward.
The result is designed to support board discussion, partner conversations, and practical prioritisation, not just another report.
One scoring model. Four commercial entry points for qualification, leadership alignment, facilitated workshops, and full diagnostic depth.
Fast qualification and early signal across all seven pillars when you need a credible, low-friction starting point.
Discuss this tierScenario-led questions for executives, board members, and governance conversations that need a sharper readout.
Discuss this tierBest for facilitated scoring, partner workshops, and cross-functional discussion where assumptions need to be challenged live.
Discuss this tierThe complete framework for evidence-led scoring, drag-factor visibility, and remediation planning.
Discuss this tierUse ResilienceScore to qualify urgency, align leadership, and surface the operational weaknesses that deserve action first.